I don’t want to pick favorites here, but there are differences that could affect your choice if you are looking to jump into TWMs. I’ve been using both Amethyst and chunkwm, and I have been fairly happy with them. The placement of windows is handled automatically for you, but you are given the power to easily rearrange and resize windows.Ī big difference between tiling window managers and traditional window managers is that when you resize a window using a tiling window manager, other windows will also resize to ensure maximum use of screen real estate with no overlap. They may do this by putting applications side-by-side, in rows, or in any number of non-overlapping layouts. ![]() Tiling window managers (TWMs) organize the applications on your desktop into non-overlapping tiles. In this post, I’ll give a brief overview of some of their differences and difficulties. ![]() In the last few months, I’ve been experimenting with using two tiling windows managers- Amethyst and chunkwm. MacOS’s window manager has a few built-in features to help manage things, but I was never completely happy with it. If you typically work with a lot of applications open at once on MacOS, you’ve probably noticed that things get pretty cluttered pretty fast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |